Security & risk
Access Governance
Least privilege that survives contact with the business.
Security & risk · Okta · Microsoft Entra ID · SailPoint · SAP
- -64%
- standing access
- -80%
- certification effort
- 0
- audit findings
Figures on this page are illustrative modelling, not measured customer results. They will be replaced with substantiated data before launch.
Access is granted under deadline pressure and reviewed once a year under audit pressure. Between those two moments entitlement sprawl compounds quietly, and nobody can say who can do what without a week of extraction work.
Request, approve, provision and certify in one governed loop. Segregation-of-duty conflicts are detected before the grant rather than discovered at the next review, and every grant carries an expiry that forces a decision.
Before and after the same population, same period. Where a figure is a median across deployments the caption says so.
Standing entitlements
-64%
Reviewer hours per campaign
-80%
SoD conflicts caught at grant
0%
| Stage | Today | With smartATOM |
|---|---|---|
| Request | Ticket describing access in prose | Entitlement selected from a modelled catalogue |
| Evaluation | Approver guesses at the risk | SoD conflicts and peer comparison computed before routing |
| Grant | Permanent by default | Time-boxed, with expiry forcing a re-decision |
| Review | Annual spreadsheet campaign | Continuous certification with usage context attached |
“Will time-boxing access break production support?”
Break-glass paths stay available and are logged as such. What expires is standing access nobody exercises — the flow warns holders before expiry and extension is one approval, so the only access that lapses is access that was not being used.
- Okta
- Microsoft Entra ID
- SailPoint
- SAP
Ready to build
smarter operations?
Join the organisations replacing manual operations with governed autonomy. Your first application is live today.
Operate smarter. Achieve more.